Maricopa County has loudly pushed back against the state Senate’s ballot review since May of last year when the Audit War Room social media account accused the county of deleting election-related databases, a claim that was repeated by former president Donald Trump and his allies. When Maricopa County does voter registration data hygiene, the standard is a seven-point match. Janine Petty, the voter registration manager at the county raised the issue that the reason for the Cyber Ninja’s over-inflated estimate of questionable ballots was because they used a commercial database with only a “soft-match” of three different data points. Presentations by elections officials were backed up by voter data spreadsheets analyzed line by line by county employees obtained when the ballot review report was leaked prior to the presentation back in September as well as screenshots from the Election Management Server. The remaining 37 were being referred to the Arizona Attorney General for potential illegal voting. They did recognize that of the 87 questionable ballots found by the Cyber Ninjas, 50 of them were double-counted in error. During the questioning, supervisors and officials frequently blamed the errors on either poor analysis or a fundamental misunderstanding of how elections are run. They found that nearly every question raised by the Cyber Ninjas was either misleading, inaccurate, or false. The company concluded that election systems were not connected to the internet.Įlection officials went line by line through claims made in the Cyber Ninjas post-ballot review report. The county hired the information technology company PacketWatch to do an additional round of internal network audits. In a more than a four-hour public hearing, county supervisors along with the county recorder questioned county election officials on the 93-page analysis released by the department that refutes nearly every claim made by the Cyber Ninjas.Ĭounty election director Scott Jarrett aggressively refuted claims made in September by ballot review contractors that election employees deleted election files and purged server logs. But overflow is a problem as valid data must be tossed, and modems just hate that.PHOENIX - After a three-month-long investigation, Maricopa County concluded that only 87 of the 53,304 ballots deemed questionable by the Arizona State Senate ballot review contractors were potentially illegally cast ballots. If you sell your internet bandwidth through PacketStream, you earn 0.10/GB as the software runs in the background of your computer. PacketStream allows users to become nodes in their network from anywhere in the world, provided you have a residential IP address. Underflow is not as much of a problem, since the relay can insert additional flags in V.21 data or padding bits at the end of a line of image data (does your relay do that?). PacketStream is another way to sell internet data to earn money. Goodbye, fax session! In the reverse case, the on-ramp modem will run dry since the off-ramp gateway is sending the bits out faster than it receives them, and T.38 relay will have to spoof some bits to keep the transmitter running (provided you have a well designed relay, of course). If the remote fax is generating bits faster than the gateway’s local modem can send them out to the fax terminal, off-ramp overflow eventually occurs. Bits generated at the transmitting endpoint fax terminal must be retransmitted by the off-ramp gateway’s local modem. These two clocks always have a different rate. However, in relay-to-relay T.38 operations, there are two analog PCM sample clocks: one at the remote transmitting fax and the other at the local re-modulating modem.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |